Wild about ‘Harry Potter’ No. 5
‘Order of the Phoenix’ has the best villain of the bunch in Dolores Umbridge
![]() Warner Bros. Pictures Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) believes Voldemort is a danger in "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." |
|
Slideshow |
Best and worst celebrity fashions of 2009 From glamorous gowns to stylish suits to complete fashion failures, a look at the year so far. more photos |
Slideshow |
more photos |
Health bill’s passage a boost for Obama? Nov. 8: NBC’s Jenna Wolfe speaks with David Gregory, moderator of “Meet the Press.” |
|
At first glance, it would appear that there’s something anticlimactic about the new film, partly because speculation about No. 7 has become semi-hysterical. No. 5 would seem to be old news before it opens. (No. 6, “Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince,” won’t arrive in theaters until late 2008.)
But the new “Harry” turns out to be one of the best entries in the series — mostly because of a villain who is the scariest and funniest heavy to date. The smugly nasty Professor Dolores Umbridge, who brings an especially ruthless form of McCarthyism to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, is played by Imelda Staunton with a sense of glee that quickly becomes irresistible.
|
“I will have order!” becomes her cry.
In an astonishingly short time, she’s insisting that all school clubs be disbanded, that boy and girl students stay at least eight inches from each other, and that only she knows how and what to teach young wizards. This fundamentalist killjoy, who turns utterances like “severe” and “so silly of me” into chilling threats, has a soft spot only for cats, who are heard meowing from several surround speakers — provided your theater has Dolby digital.
An Oscar nominee for her performance as a doomed British abortionist in “Vera Drake,” Staunton might earn another Academy nod for this very different yet equally satisfying performance. If so, she’d be the first actor in the series to earn such recognition. You can’t help missing this monster when she’s not around.
|
Rowling’s book is nearly 900 pages long, so the filmmakers have a lot of plot to deal with — some of it concerning a test of the integrity of the boy wizard Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), who claims to have encountered the evil Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) in the previous movie, “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.” When he’s temporarily expelled from Hogwarts, he can count on few allies; among them are his old pals, Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson).
Loyalty quickly becomes a major concern. Harry’s insistence that everyone’s threatened by the return of Voldemort (or “He Who Must Not Be Named”) turns the boy into a pariah. Persecuted by Umbridge, feeling “more alone than ever” and “angry all the time,” he grows up in a hurry, deciding to listen to his instincts and to act upon them.
As he reportedly demonstrated in a recent London stage production of “Equus,” Radcliffe is now more than ready for adult roles. The more isolated Harry becomes, the more soulful Radcliffe seems. As Harry grows less sure of himself, Radcliffe becomes more assured in his handling of the character’s complexities. He’s never seemed so vulnerable — and he’s never before suggested such authority.
Harry helps to form a group of an anti-Umbridge rebels who call themselves “Dumbledore’s Army,” even though Dumbledore appears to greet them with indifference. Much of the story is driven by Harry’s self-doubt — and his fear that he and his fellow students can’t compete with the forces of darkness, which also include the venomous Lucius Malfoy (Jason Isaacs).
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM ENTERTAINMENT |
| Add Entertainment headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide





