Supreme Court will not revive Plame's lawsuit

Former CIA operative accused Bush administration of leaking her identity

	Former CIA employee Valerie Plame sued members of the Bush administration for revealing her identity to reporters in 2003. However, a lower court last year threw out the lawsuit and the Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear an appeal.
Larry Downing / Reuters file

Multimedia stories

Getty Images	Who’s a good Bo? See the Obama family’s frisky new Portuguese water dog pup, Bo, sink his paws into his classy new digs: the White House.
Pete Souza	Inside Obama's White House Get a glimpse of President Barack Obama's first 100 days, through the lens of photographer Pete Souza.
AP	First sons and daughters Under many administrations, the corridors of the White House have resounded with the patter of little feet.
AP	Michelle Obama's effortless style The first lady looks as sophisticated in designer dresses as she does in outfits from J. Crew.

Most popular video

Family ditches home for RV
Nov. 27: With the high rate of foreclosures, many families are going to extremes to survive. NBC's Michelle Franzen has the story of one family who is spending their days on the road.

What’s your sex IQ?

An update with the 650-pound virgin

One girl’s wish for an organ transplant

Uninvited couple sneaks into state dinner

updated 3:16 p.m. ET June 22, 2009

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court will not revive a lawsuit that former CIA operative Valerie Plame brought against former members of the Bush administration.

The court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

A lower court last year threw out the lawsuit in which Plame and Wilson accused former Vice President Dick Cheney and several former high-ranking administration officials of disclosing her identity to reporters in 2003. Plame and Wilson said that violated their constitutional rights.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here

The lawsuit named former presidential adviser Karl Rove; Cheney's former top aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby; and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

The U.S. Court of Appeals said that Plame and Wilson did not meet the legal standard for constitutional claims, in part because the lawsuit hinges on alleged violations of the Privacy Act — a law that does not cover the president or the vice president's offices.

Case background
Armitage was the original source for a 2003 newspaper column identifying Plame as a CIA officer. At the time, her husband was criticizing the Bush administration's prewar intelligence on Iraq and had become a thorn in the side of the White House. Rove also discussed Plame's employment with reporters.

NBC VIDEO
Plame sues Cheney, Rove in leak case
July 14, 2006: Former CIA operative Valerie Plame and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, read statements, during a news conference about their suit against Vice President Dick Cheney, top White House aide Karl Rove and others.
MSNBC
The leak touched off a lengthy investigation that resulted in Libby's conviction for obstruction and lying to investigators. Jurors found that he told reporters about Plame and lied about it to the FBI and a federal grand jury. President George W. Bush commuted Libby's sentence before he ever served a day in prison.

Nobody was ever charged with the leak itself and Plame's lawsuit is one of the last remaining legal issues associated with the case.

Click for related content

Judge to review Cheney interview with FBI
Plame sues White House figures over CIA leak
Court won't resurrect lawsuit in CIA leak case

Discuss Story On Newsvine
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh
Email
Instant Message
Print

Categories

Supreme Court will not revive Plame's lawsuit

Former CIA operative accused Bush administration of leaking her identity